Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Clinics ; 64(9): 903-909, 2009. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-526331

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The scientific production of institutions of higher education, as well as the dissemination and use of this published work by peer institutions, can be assessed by means of quantitative and qualitative measurements. This type of analysis can also serve as the basis of further academic actions. Variables such as the type of evaluation, the number of faculty members and the decision to include or exclude researchers who are not professors are difficult to measure when comparing different schools and institutions. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the scientific production of tenured faculty from the Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina performed from 2001 to 2006. METHODS: Medline/PubMed database was considered and the Impact factors (IFs - Journal Citation Report, 2006) and the number of generated citations (Web of Science/ISI Thomson) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The analysis of the scientific production of 66 full professors (level MS-6) revealed 1,960 scientific articles published in 630 scientific journals, of which 31.3 percent were Brazilian and 68.7 percent were from international sources. Among these, 47 percent of the articles were published in 62.9 percent of the journals with IFs above 10, although 16.4 percent of the journals did not have assigned IF values. We verified that 45 percent of the published articles received 9,335 citations (average of 11 + 17), with the majority of these (8,968 citations) appearing in international scientific journals. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that it is possible to analyze the scientific production of a learning institution by the number of papers published by full professors, taking into account not only their academic position and influence, but also the fact that publication is an opportunity to stimulate joint projects with other members of the same institution.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Bibliometrics , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Faculty, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Periodicals as Topic , Schools, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , MEDLINE
2.
Rev. med. (Säo Paulo) ; 85(4): 168-173, 2006. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-458859

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar, quantitativamente, o processo de evolução da Revista de Medicina. A análise da revista foi realizada, observando: conteúdo, resumos, descritores ou palavras-chave (incluidos ou não), ISSN, legendas, editorial, análise de temas/assuntos específicos ou gerais e quantidade de autores e artigos. Nesses 90 anos de existência, está inserida no rol de periódicos científicos que contribuem para divulgar e disseminar a informação referente à bibliografia médica produzida no Brasil...


The aim of the analysis is to quantitatively evaluate the progress of the "Revista de Medicina"and report its journey pathway during 90 years of existence. The journal's analysis was carried through: contents, summaries, keywords, ISSN, legends, editorial, analysis of specific or general subjects and the number of authours and articles. During the 90 years publication, the journal figures in the roll of scientific journals that contribute to divulge and...


Subject(s)
Scientific and Technical Publications , Periodical/history
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL